Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 18 Dec 2012

The Architecture of the Aquatic Environment and Its Influence on the Growth and Development of Tadpoles (Xenopus laevis)

and
Page Range: 690 – 697
DOI: 10.1643/CE-11-012
Save
Download PDF

Many ecological factors are known to influence anuran growth and development. However, little is known about the influence of the shape of the aquatic environment. We investigated how the size of the air–water interface (surface area), water depth, and partitioning the aquatic space independently affect the growth and development of tadpoles of Xenopus laevis. To do this, we used a series of pyramidal frustra and partitioned aquaria. In our experimental containers, as the surface area decreased the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased and the tadpoles' air-breathing rates increased. As the depth of the water increased, the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased and the tadpoles' air-breathing rates increased. When the aquatic space was vertically partitioned to form a maze with corridors either 2 cm or 4 cm wide, the tadpoles avoided the narrow spaces between the partitions. Neither varying the surface area, nor vertically partitioning the aquatic space, significantly affected the growth or development of the tadpoles. However, the tadpoles raised in the shallower containers grew significantly slower than the tadpoles raised in the deeper containers. Tadpoles raised in shallow water behaved differently than those raised in deeper water. Shallow water appeared to prevent the tadpoles from ascending normally to break the surface tension of the water and properly air-breathe. Instead, the tadpoles in the shallow containers often floated at the surface, rather than in their normal position in the water column. Our study suggests that shallow water, independent of other variables such as water volume or dissolved oxygen concentration, may detrimentally impact air-breathing tadpoles, since shallow water appears to physically impede the animals' ability to air-breathe.

Copyright: 2012 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Diagrams of the treatment containers for the surface area (left) and depth experiment (right). The three surface area containers differ in the size of the air–water interface but maintain the same water depth (9 cm) and volume (3 L). From top to bottom the air–water interface areas are 100 cm2, 199 cm2, and 299 cm2.

The three depth containers differ in the water depth but maintain the same air–water interface area (199 cm2) and contain the same volume of water (3 L). From top to bottom the depths are 6 cm, 12 cm, and 18 cm. The containers were filled to the top. To make sure the tadpoles did not escape from the containers a 4 cm high wire mesh vertical barrier (not shown) was attached to the top outer edge of the containers. The dimensions given are the internal dimensions.


Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Diagrams of the two treatment containers for the aquatic space partitioning experiment. In the top diagram the partitions are spaced 2 cm apart; in the bottom diagram the partitions are spaced 4 cm apart. The top, 2 cm tank has an air–water interface area of 546 cm2, and the bottom, 4 cm tank has an air–water interface area of 510 cm2. Since the 2 cm containers had more partitions than the 4 cm containers, the 2 cm containers were made slightly larger to hold equal water volumes in the two tanks. Both containers held 3 L of water and were 6 cm deep. Each of the partitions was perforated multiple times with holes 3 mm in diameter spaced 1 mm apart. The holes allowed water to circulate but were small enough that the tadpoles could not swim through them. The dimensions given here are internal dimensions.


Contributor Notes

Associate Editor: J. W. Snodgrass.

Received: 26 Jan 2011
Accepted: 03 Jun 2012
  • Download PDF