Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 27 Jun 2012

Terrestrial Movements and Habitat Preferences of Male Cricket Frogs on a Golf Course

,
,
, and
Page Range: 191 – 196
DOI: 10.1643/CE-11-078
Save
Download PDF

Northern Cricket Frogs, Acris crepitans, are experiencing population declines throughout their range for unknown reasons. Habitat alteration is one potential explanation, so evaluating habitat use and movement of Cricket Frogs could be valuable to protect and manage this species. To understand how altered landscapes influence Cricket Frog movements, we initiated a study at a golf course to assess the dispersal of adults on a variety of terrestrial habitat types (mown grass, unmown grass, or the ecotone between mown and unmown grass) released at different distances from a single pond (10, 20, or 40 m). We monitored movements of adult male frogs by marking individuals with fluorescent powder. Distance from the pond did not appear to affect movement or orientation toward the pond. However, Cricket Frog movement was significantly affected by habitat type. Cricket Frogs produced longer paths in unmown grass and were more likely to orient toward the pond than frogs released at the ecotone, which may be beneficial during dispersal events. Frogs released in both unmown and mown grass moved in straighter paths than frogs released at the ecotone between these habitats, suggesting that, when given the choice, both habitat types are used to potentially optimize travel, foraging, and/or avoiding predation. Our research suggests that while managed green spaces may provide suitable habitat for connecting pond-breeding amphibians, habitat with more structure (i.e., unmown grass) may offer Cricket Frogs the greatest benefits.

Copyright: 2012 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Diagram of the experimental layout. Nine cricket frogs were released on each of nine nights. One frog was released at each of the release sites at 10, 20, or 40 m from the pond and located in mown grass, unmown grass, or at the ecotone between these two habitat types. Release points in the mown and unmown grass were 15 m from the ecotone. Deflection angle ranged from 0 to 180°, with 0° indicating a frog moved directly toward the pond and 180° indicating a frog moved directly away from the pond. An example of this calculation is illustrated with a theoretical frog path (solid line) and the most direct path to the pond (dotted line); the angle between these two points represents the “deflection angle.”


Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

(A) Total distance and displacement (cm) that Cricket Frogs traveled in mown, ecotone, and unmown grass habitats. Differing letters indicate significant differences according to Scheffe's test for total distance. (B) Straightness ( = displacement/total distance traveled) of path of Cricket Frogs across habitat types. Values closer to 1.0 indicate straighter travel paths. (C) Angle of deflection of Cricket Frogs across habitat types. Values <90° indicate movement toward the pond, while values >90° indicate movement away from the pond. Differing letters indicate significant differences according to Scheffe's test. Error bars in all figures represent ±1 SE.


Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Relationship between Cricket Frog mass and (A) total distance traveled (cm) and (B) displacement.


Contributor Notes

Associate Editor: J. D. Litzgus.

Received: 06 Jun 2011
Accepted: 24 Jan 2012
  • Download PDF