Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 14 May 2025

Mapping an Unseen Landscape: An Analysis of Scale Texture in Two Darter Fishes

and
Page Range: 283 – 293
DOI: 10.1643/i2023099
Save
Download PDF

Fish scales can vary considerably in surface texture and morphological features, and these attributes may impact energetic performance during swimming or station holding in swiftly flowing waters. We examined the scale texture of two members of the darter family, Etheostoma blennioides (the Greenside Darter) and Nothonotus rufilineatus (the Redline Darter), which differ in body size and habitat specialization. We applied gel-based profilometry, a non-destructive approach to produce high resolution 3D reconstructions of surface features, to measure surface texture in these two species. Texture properties from these scans can be quantified using surface metrological variables used in mechanical engineering and geographic terrain mapping. Using the novel handheld GelSight tool, high resolution scans were taken from preserved specimens and were processed using OmniSurf3D. Through these scans, 11 surface metrology variables were collected from two anatomical locations (caudal and flank scales). We found significant differences in at least seven of those traits in regard to species and body size. Redline Darters possessed proportionately rougher, spikier, and more ornamented scales, and these species are more specialized to high current environments. However, Greenside Darters also showed consistently stronger allometry in texture values, with large specimens showing similar values to Redline Darters. We suggest that these differences may have functional implications for the varying current and turbulent conditions in particular. Such studies are rare for both smaller and rheophilic fishes, and further testing (e.g., macroevolutionary, fluid mechanics) may reveal connections between surface texture and life in turbulent environments.

Copyright: © 2025 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Analysis of darter scale texture using gel-based profilometry. (A) One of six high resolution images used in the 3D reconstruction of surface texture (B) from a flank scan of a Greenside Darter (Etheostoma blennioides). (C) Removal of overall form using polynomial regression and (D) filtering of wavelengths (features) greater than scale size.


Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Scale variation in Greenside Darters (Etheostoma blennioides) across different body sizes (SL). Scale bars show 1 mm.


Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Scale variation in Redline Darters (Nothonotus rufilineatus) across different body sizes (SL). Scale bars show 1 mm.


Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Distribution of scale texture parameters from flank and caudal scales from two darter species (Greenside Darters, Etheostoma blennioides, and Redline Darters, Nothonotus rufilineatus). See text for variable descriptions. Variables found to differ between species (across all body regions, while accounting for SL) marked with *.


Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Scale texture parameters from flank and caudal scales from two darter species (Greenside Darters, Etheostoma blennioides, and Redline Darters, Nothonotus rufilineatus) plotted against body size (standard length). Variables are described in text. Only variables that had a significant difference with size and/or between species are shown.


Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

Comparison of scale shapes for Greenside Darters (green circles) and Redline Darters (orange squares). Fineness ratio is the scale height divided by width, and aspect ratio is the trailing edge length divided by scale width. Relative scale size is the square root of scale area divided by standard length.


Contributor Notes

Associate Editor: W. L. Smith.

Received: 04 Dec 2023
Accepted: 11 Mar 2025
  • Download PDF