Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 17 Dec 2010

What Doesn't Kill You Makes You Sluggish: How Sublethal Pesticides Alter Predator–Prey Interactions

and
Page Range: 558 – 567
DOI: 10.1643/CE-09-027
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Pesticides commonly occur in ecological communities at relatively low concentrations, leading to growing interest in determining the sublethal effects of pesticides. Such effects should affect individuals and, in turn, alter interspecific interactions. We sought to determine how sublethal concentrations (0.1 and 1.0 mg/L) of two common pesticides (carbaryl and malathion) affected predator and prey behavior as well as subsequent predation rates. We conducted a series of experiments using three species of larval amphibians (Gray Treefrogs, Hyla versicolor; Green Frogs, Rana clamitans; and American Bullfrogs, R. catesbeiana) and three species of their predators (larval dragonflies, Anax junius; adult water bugs, Belostoma flumineum; and adult Red-spotted Newts, Notophthalmus viridescens). We found that the pesticides frequently reduced the activity of all three tadpole species. For the two invertebrate predators (Anax and Belostoma), the pesticides were lethal, precluding us from examining sublethal effects on predator–prey interactions. However, newt survival was high and the addition of the pesticides reduced the predation rates of newts in one of the three tadpole species. There were no effects of the pesticides on the striking frequency of the newts or on their prey capture efficiency. Thus, the mechanism underlying the pesticide-induced reduction in predation rates remains unclear. What is clear is that sublethal concentrations of pesticides have the potential to alter prey behavior and species interactions and thereby alter the composition of ecological communities.

Copyright: 2010 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The activity of tadpoles (A. Gray Treefrogs, H. versicolor; B. Green Frogs, R. clamitans; and C. Bullfrogs, R. catesbeiana) when exposed to four predator environments and two concentrations of insecticides (malathion and carbaryl). Activity was defined as the proportion of tadpoles moving in a tub, averaged over ten observations in a one-hour period. Note that each panel has a different y-axis scale to reveal the detail of each species. Data are means ± 1 SE. Asterisks indicate those pesticide treatments that differ from the control treatment.


Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The survival of tadpoles (A. Gray Treefrogs, H. versicolor; B. Green Frogs, R. clamitans; and C. Bullfrogs, R. catesbeiana) when exposed to two predator environments and two concentrations of insecticides (malathion and carbaryl) over a 22-hour period. Data are means ± 1 SE. Asterisks indicate those pesticide treatments that differ from the control treatment.


Fig. 3
Fig. 3

The predatory behavior (number of strikes and capture efficiency, number of captures/total number of strikes) of Red-spotted Newts (Notophthalmus viridescens) when exposed to 0.1 mg/L of insecticides (malathion and carbaryl). Data are means ± 1 SE.


Contributor Notes

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260; E-mail: (RAR) relyea@pitt.edu. Send reprint requests to RAR.

Associate Editor: S. E. Wise.

Received: 02 Feb 2009
Accepted: 11 May 2010
  • Download PDF