Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 18 Dec 2008

Native Fish and Anuran Assemblages Differ between Impoundments with and without Non-Native Centrarchids and Bullfrogs

and
Page Range: 931 – 939
DOI: 10.1643/CE-07-089
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Centrarchids (sunfish and bass species) and Bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus) have been introduced into aquatic systems around the world and have the potential to negatively impact native fish and anurans. We surveyed fish and anuran assemblages from 26 impoundments in the New Jersey Pinelands, USA. We excluded non-native species and used ordination analysis to generate four native-species community gradients based on native-fish and anuran presence–absence and abundance data. All four community gradients paralleled an increase in the percentage of upstream-altered land (development and upland agriculture) and an increase in either non-native-centrarchid richness or abundance. Based on presence–absence and abundance data, native-fish and native-anuran assemblages, including restricted species (those generally limited to the Pinelands region) and widespread species (those widely distributed in New Jersey), differed between impoundments with and without non-native centrarchids. Compared to widespread species, the greatest differences between impoundment types were found for restricted species. Three non-native-frog species, including Bullfrogs, were associated with degraded impoundments that supported non-native fish. Our results demonstrate that watershed conditions and native fish and anuran assemblages differ between impoundments with and without non-native centrarchids, and suggest that some restricted species may be especially vulnerable to impacts from watershed disturbance and non-native species. Our findings support the idea that the environmental resistance associated with intact water-quality conditions may help prevent the invasion of non-native fish and anurans. We recommend that land-use activities that degrade water quality and reduce invasion resistance be avoided in unaltered watersheds to conserve native-fish and native-anuran community integrity.

Copyright: 2008 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Location of 26 impoundments in the Mullica River watershed of the New Jersey Pinelands, USA. The shaded area in the inset represents the Pinelands region. Altered land is developed land and upland agriculture.


Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Distribution of various biogeographic groups and species of fish and anurans at 26 impoundments. Impoundments are ordered by the percentage of upstream-altered land (developed land and upland agriculture), which is represented by shaded bars. Filled circles and open circles indicate whether a group or species was present and absent, respectively.


Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Frequency of occurrence and the percentage of the total abundance for each native-fish and native-anuran species at impoundments with and without non-native centrarchids. Species are ordered left to right by increasing DCA axis 1 species scores from the native-fish and native-anuran presence–absence ordinations. Abbreviations for species names represent the first few letters from each part of the common names listed in Table 1.


Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Frequency of occurrence of restricted Carpenter Frog and non-native Bullfrog adults and larvae at impoundments with and without non-native centrarchids.


Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Medians, quartiles, and 10th and 90th percentiles for (A) impoundment size, (B) pH, (C) specific conductance (μS cm−1), and (D) the percentage of upstream-altered land (developed land and upland agriculture) for impoundments with (present) and without (absent) non-native centrarchids.


Contributor Notes

Associate Editor: J. W. Snodgrass.

Pinelands Commission, P.O. Box 7, New Lisbon, New Jersey 08064, e-mail: (JFB) john.bunnell@njpines.state.nj.us. Send reprint requests to JFB.
Received: 10 Apr 2007
Accepted: 06 Jun 2008
  • Download PDF