Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 10 Sept 2008

Effective Crypsis and Its Maintenance by Immobility in Craugastor Frogs

,
, and
Page Range: 527 – 532
DOI: 10.1643/CE-07-056
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Prey that are cryptic when at rest should limit movement to avoid disrupting crypsis. We studied effectiveness of crypsis and degree of reliance on immobility versus escape by Craugastor frogs approached by a predator. We studied detectability of C. fitzingeri resting in a 2 m diameter circle of leaf litter using four human observers. Nearly 40% of frogs were not detected within 60 s, and mean detection time was more than 30 s despite a small search area. Given a much lower density in natural habitats, it is likely that these frogs are rarely detected visually without area-concentrated search, except perhaps by predators sensitive to wavelengths not detected by human beings. When approached by a human, over 90% of individuals belonging to five species of Craugastor remained immobile until the predator reached them. Only C. noblei fled, and this species fled more frequently than the others at higher approach speed. Approach speed did not affect probability of jumping or distance jumped. Distance jumped varied among species, but was unrelated to body length except for C. mimus during fast approaches. Extreme reliance on crypsis reinforced by immobility suggests that crypsis is so effective in these frogs that survivorship may be higher for individuals that do not attempt to escape. The increased probability of being detected and attacked upon moving combined with limited escape capacity presumably raises the probability of being captured for frogs that jump. The importance of crypsis is emphasized by observations that almost all frogs that jumped reestablished crypsis after a single jump by becoming immobile, and some burrowed into leaf litter upon landing, concealing the head and part of the body.

Copyright: 2008 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Figure 1
Figure 1

Mean number of seconds required by four investigators to detect a Craugastor fitzingeri in a circle of leaf litter (2 m diameter). A C. fitzingeri was in the circle in trials with one frog; a C. fitzingeri and a Dendrobates auratus were present in trials with two frogs. Error bars represent 1.0 SE.


Figure 2
Figure 2

The proportions of trials in which Craugastor fitzingeri in a circle of leaf litter 2 m in diameter went undetected within 60 s by four investigators. A C. fitzingeri was in the circle in trials with one frog; a C. fitzingeri and a Dendrobates auratus were present in trials with two frogs.


Contributor Notes

Associate Editor: G. Haenel.

Department of Biology, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46805; E-mail: cooperw@ipfw.edu. Send reprint requests to this address.
Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History and Department of Zoology, Norman, Oklahoma 73072.
Received: 05 Mar 2007
Accepted: 05 Nov 2007
  • Download PDF