Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 May 2007

Diet of the Invasive Frog, Eleutherodactylus Coqui, in Hawaii

Page Range: 281 – 291
DOI: 10.1643/0045-8511(2007)7[281:DOTIFE]2.0.CO;2
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Because of their high densities and generalist feeding behaviors, the introduced frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui, has been hypothesized to consume and potentially reduce endemic invertebrates in Hawaii. To address this hypothesis, I compared E. coqui diets to invertebrate abundances in 11 sites on the Islands of Hawaii and Maui in the summer of 2004. At each site, I collected between 22 and 119 frogs from 20 × 20-m plots, and invertebrates from light traps, beating trays, and leaf litter samples. Prey items in frog stomachs were identified to order, and invertebrates collected in environmental samples were identified to the lowest taxonomic category possible. Multivariate analyses of diet content and invertebrates collected at each site suggest that most prey was from the leaf litter. Non-native ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and amphipods (Amphipoda: Talitridae) comprised 30% and 22%, respectively, of the total prey items consumed. These non-native invertebrates were more abundant in stomachs of E. coqui than in the environment indicating a preference for these species. There was little evidence that E. coqui were reducing important invertebrate pests. No mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) were found in stomachs, and termites (Isoptera) comprised <1% of the total prey items. Arthropod orders containing endemic species that appear most vulnerable to E. coqui predation include Acarina (mites), Coleoptera (beetles), Collembola (springtails), and Diptera (flies), which each made up >2% of the diet of E. coqui. Dominant prey items in frog stomachs differed among study sites suggesting that frogs are opportunistic feeders and forage on abundant prey items. Eleutherodactylus coqui management should focus on areas with endemic invertebrates of concern because it is these locations where E. coqui may have the greatest impact.

Copyright: 2007 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Figure 1
Figure 1

Percent of adult and subadult frogs (+ SE) collected on microhabitat structures across 11 study sites in Hawaii. BR = branch, FB = fallen branch, FL = fallen leaf, FT = fallen trunk, LF = leaf, LL = leaf litter, RK/RT = rock/root, SO = soil, ST = stem, TK = trunk, and OTHER.


Figure 2
Figure 2

PCA of invertebrate categories found in stomachs of E. coqui and flying, foliage, and litter invertebrate communities sampled in each of 11 study sites in Hawaii. Invertebrates were categorized as in Table 4.


Figure 3
Figure 3

PCA of invertebrate categories found in stomachs of E. coqui and (A) foliage invertebrate communities, and (B) litter invertebrate communities in each of 11 study sites in Hawaii.


Contributor Notes

Section editor: T. W. Reeder.

Received: 25 May 2006
Accepted: 12 Dec 2006
  • Download PDF