Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Dec 2004

Geographic Variation in Hyla wrightorum: Advertisement Calls, Allozymes, mtDNA, and Morphology

,
, and
Page Range: 758 – 769
DOI: 10.1643/CG-04-061R
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

We studied geographic variation in allozymes (22 loci), mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequences (575 bp), advertisement calls (pulse rate, call duration, and dominant frequency), and snout–vent length among populations of Hyla wrightorum and Hyla eximia in the United States and Mexico. Calls were only available for H. wrightorum, and although populations varied in some advertisement call variables, there was no indication of species level differentiation. Allozyme variation was exhibited among the H. wrightorum populations, but no fixed differences were discovered, and the amount of genetic divergence among populations was small (Dm ≤ 0.0643). Seven mtDNA haplotypes were discovered among the H. wrightorum individuals included in this study. A single haplotype (G) was present in the Huachuca Mountains and was found only in this population restricted to southeast Arizona. Neither the Mogollon Rim nor the Sonora populations were exclusive, with some haplotypes in each being more closely related to haplotypes in the other population. Molecular data (allozymes and mtDNA), as well as the advertisement calls, support continued recognition of two species: H. eximia in central-southern Mexico and H. wrightorum, which consists of disjunct populations in the Sierra Madre Occidental of northern Mexico, the Huachuca Mountains of southeastern Arizona, and the mountains of central Arizona and western New Mexico.

Copyright: The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
 Fig. 1. 
 Fig. 1. 

Collecting localities for Arizona Treefrogs (Hyla wrightorum; 1–6) in Arizona, and northern Mexico, and Mountain Treefrogs (Hyla eximia; 7) in southern Mexico. 1 = Flagstaff; 2 = East Clear Creek; 3 = McNary; 4 = Hannagan Meadow; 5 = Huachucas/ Canelo Hills; 6 = Sonora; 7 = Mexico, D.F


 Fig. 2. 
 Fig. 2. 

(A) Single optimal maximum-likelihood phylogeny of the cytochrome b haplotypes within Hyla eximia and Hyla wrightorum. Letters following the individual localities denote the given haplotype. Numbers along the branches represent Bayesian posterior probabilities (above) and bootstrap percentages (below). Maximum-likelihood model (GTR + I + Γ)parameters used: Base frequencies: A = 0.28132, C = 0.31993, G = 0.10084, T = 0.29792; R-matrix: A–C = 2.34, A—G = 26.05, A–T = 2.63, C—G = 1.39, C–T = 21.20, G— T 1.00; Pinvar = 0.52; α = 0.97. (B) Haplotype network for H. wrightorum. Numbers along branches denote the number of nucleotide substitutions between haplotypes. The arrow denotes optimal placement of the root for this network based on the maximum-likelihood analysis


 Fig. 3. 
 Fig. 3. 

Advertisement call pulse rate against body (cloacal) temperature (A) and dominant frequency against snout–vent length (B) for Central Arizona (open squares), Huachucas/Canelo Hills (solid circles), and Sonora, Mexico (open triangles) populations of Hyla wrightorum


Contributor Notes

(EG) Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287–1501; (TR) Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182–4614; and (BKS) Department of Life Sciences, Arizona State University West, P.O. Box 37100, Phoenix, Arizona 85069-7100. E-mail: (BKS) bsullivan@asu.edu Send reprint requests to BKS.

Accepted: 04 Aug 2004
  • Download PDF