Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Feb 2003

Disentangling Female Mate Choice and Male Competition in the Rainbow Darter, Etheostoma caeruleum

Page Range: 138 – 148
DOI: 10.1643/0045-8511(2003)003[0138:DFMCAM]2.0.CO;2
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Sexual selection via female choice is assumed to be common in darters despite few studies demonstrating the phenomenon. This study examines the breeding behaviors of the rainbow darter, Etheostoma caeruleum, and addresses the following four questions: Do females exhibit mating preferences? Which behavioral variables are good measures of female mating preferences? Which male behaviors are used in the context of mating? How do female choice and male competition affect mating success? In dichotomous choice tests, where females could choose between males from two different populations, females performed a precopulatory behavior (nosedigs) significantly more often in front of males from Prairieville Creek than they did in front of males from Seven Mile Creek. However, no pattern of choice was detected when preference was measured as the amount of time spent associated with each male. When the animals were allowed to interact freely, males competed aggressively over the female by chasing and attacking each other. Group spawns occurred where two males mated simultaneously with the female. Male spawning success was positively correlated with male guarding ability (the ability to prevent a competing male from coming between himself and the female). However, there were no significant correlations between overt aggression (chases and attacks) and male spawning success or between female preference (measured in dichotomous choice tests) and male spawning success. Male interactions, in the form of guarding, appear to play a larger role in determining male mating success than does female choice.

Copyright: The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
 Fig. 1. 
 Fig. 1. 

Mate choice aquaria set-up. (A) Trial 1. The female has visual access to both males. (B) Trial 2. The female has both visual and olfactory access to both males. (C) Trial 3. Identical aquarium set-up as in trial 2 only the positions of the males have been reversed. (D) 1.5-h observation period. Fish are allowed to interact freely for 1.5 h. For the purpose of demonstration the Prairieville Creek male is initially placed in the left aquarium, but the position of males was randomized across replicates


 Fig. 2. 
 Fig. 2. 

Preference scores in trials 1, 2, 3, and the overall preference score using nosedigs and time as measures of preference. Data are shown for replicates where spawnings occurred within 24 h (i.e., during 1.5-h observation period or within subsequent day). Sample sizes are as follows: nosedig scores trial 1 n = 4, trial 2 n = 10, trial 3 n = 10, overall n = 12; time scores n =15 in all cases. Means and standard errors are shown. Preference is detected when the preference scores differ from a null expectation of 0.5 denoted by the black line


Received: 03 Aug 2001
Accepted: 10 Sept 2002
  • Download PDF