Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Dec 2002

Foraging Ecology of Rainbow Skinks (Mabuya margaritifer) in Southern Africa

and
Page Range: 943 – 957
DOI: 10.1643/0045-8511(2002)002[0943:FEORSM]2.0.CO;2
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

We determined group composition and foraging mode in a wild population of rupicolous rainbow skinks (Mabuya margaritifer) on rocky outcrops in a humid savannah of South Africa and examined diet, sexual dimorphism, and life-history traits in museum material. We also field-tested lizards for prey chemical discrimination. Males were larger than females in both body and head size. Both sexes reached maturity at 68 mm SVL, and females produced clutches of 2–9 eggs. Males excluded other males from their home range but shared overnight crevices with 1–4 females and 1–6 juveniles. Mabuya margaritifer were ambush foragers when only the amount of time spent moving (8%) was considered; however, other variables such as moves per minute (1.3) and average speed (0.01 m/s) suggest an intermediate foraging mode between active and ambush foraging for the population studied. Lizards spent most time on rock (81.5%) but also moved into vegetation (7.9%) and along the rock-vegetation interface (10.6%). Both sexes spent similar amounts of time in these microhabitats and were observed feeding in all three. Diet was dominated by termites, and overlap in prey types between sexes was high. In experimental tests for prey chemical discrimination, lizards tongue-flicked rarely, giving no indication of an ability to discriminate prey chemicals. Also, lizards observed in the field during focal observations performed few tongue-flicks. Based on these results, sexual dimorphism is best explained by sexual selection via male contest competition and not by ecological niche divergence.

Copyright: The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
 Fig. 1. 
 Fig. 1. 

Distribution of snout–vent lengths for male and female Mabuya margaritifer. Arrow indicates size at sexual maturity


 Fig. 2. 
 Fig. 2. 

Relationship between head width and SVL for male and female Mabuya margaritifer


 Fig. 5. 
 Fig. 5. 

Distribution of individual prey sizes consumed by Mabuya margaritifer


 Fig. 6. 
 Fig. 6. 

Numerical frequency of main prey categories in Mabuya margaritifer, by sex and season


 Fig. 7. 
 Fig. 7. 

Frequency of male and female Mabuya margaritifer containing main prey categories


 Fig. 3. 
 Fig. 3. 

Relationship between head length and SVL for male and female Mabuya margaritifer


 Fig. 4. 
 Fig. 4. 

Relationship between head height and SVL for male and female Mabuya margaritifer


Received: 30 Jul 2001
Accepted: 25 Jun 2002
  • Download PDF