Antipredator Responses of Free-Ranging Pit Vipers(Gloydius shedaoensis, Viperidae)
Few quantitative data are available on the ways in which venomous snakes respond to humans. We took advantage of extraordinarily high numbers of endemic pit vipers on the small island of Shedao in northeastern China, to quantify snake responses. We approached free-ranging pit vipers in their ambush sites (either in trees or on the ground) and recorded their behavior. The snakes' responses to our approach depended upon (1) the intensity of the stimulus; (2) attributes of the snake (size class, body temperature, whether it had fed recently); and (3) the snake's location (in an arboreal or terrestrial site). Most snakes tolerated close approach. Juvenile pit vipers struck more often than adults, and warmer snakes were more likely to flee, display, or strike rather than rely on crypsis. Snakes on the ground were more likely to flee or strike than were those in trees. Many of the same patterns were seen in our laboratory trials. For example, striking was more frequent in juveniles than adults, in hotter snakes, and in snakes that displayed (tail-vibrated). Both strike speeds and tail-vibration rates increased with body temperature. Responses of Shedao pit vipers to human approach differ from those reported for other snake species.Abstract

Proportions of free-ranging pit vipers displaying alternative possible responses (flee, display, or strike) to close approach and harassment by a human. The data are divided into responses of snakes that were in foraging sites in trees versus on ground when tested and are further divided into responses during two consecutive 30-sec periods (“initial” and “subsequent”). Sample sizes are 107 snakes on the ground, 63 snakes in trees

Body temperatures of pit vipers that exhibited different responses to approach and harassment by a human. The graphs show temperatures of snakes that (A) fled versus remained stationary; (B) displayed (tail-vibrated) versus did not display when approached; and (C) struck versus did not strike on our initial approach. The data are divided into responses during two consecutive 30-sec periods (“initial” and “subsequent”). Graphs show mean value ± 1 SE; sample sizes above each histogram

Relationship between the body temperature of a Shedao pit viper and three attributes of its defensive response: (A) the number of times it struck within a 60-sec trial; (B) the maximum speed of its strike; and (C) the maximum rate at which it vibrated its tail-tip in a threat display. See text for statistical analysis