Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Aug 2002

Communication by Fecal Chemosignals in an Archaic Frog, Leiopelma hamiltoni

and
Page Range: 679 – 686
DOI: 10.1643/0045-8511(2002)002[0679:CBFCIA]2.0.CO;2
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Communication by acoustic signals has been extensively studied in anuran amphibians, but other sensory modalities have been largely ignored. We show here that the frog Leiopelma hamiltoni communicates through fecal chemosignals. When given a choice between their own and other individuals' feces, subjects spent more time near their own feces. Further, this effect was greatest when the conspecific was larger in body size, suggesting that information about size as well as individuality is communicated. Time spent near conspecific feces correlated negatively with the distance between the collection sites of the frogs. This correlation may reflect differential responses to the feces of frogs of varied levels of kinship and social familiarity: frogs may avoid nonrelatives and unfamiliar conspecifics. To test the hypothesis that frogs alter fecal production upon exposure to conspecific feces, we presented subjects with either one smear of their own and one smear of a conspecific's feces or two smears of their own feces. Frogs did not defecate more when exposed to conspecific feces. However, when the frogs did defecate, they placed their feces closer to the conspecific's feces than to their own. This supports our hypothesis that feces serve as signals to conspecifics. Visual and tactile cues were eliminated in our experiments. Our results show that the frog L. hamiltoni communicates with conspecifics through chemical signals. We suggest that chemical signaling may be widespread in anuran amphibians.

Copyright: The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
 Fig. 1. 
 Fig. 1. 

Numbers of subjects that spent more than half their time on the side with their own fecal smear (black bars) or with the conspecific's fecal smear (white bars; evening: P = 0.029; night: P = 0.169; morning: P = 1.000; binomial tests). When data are analyzed over the duration of the night, subjects preferred their own smears (see text)


 Fig. 2. 
 Fig. 2. 

Time spent on the side with the conspecific's fecal smear correlated negatively with the distance between the frogs' collection points


 Fig. 3. 
 Fig. 3. 

Subjects spent less time on the side with the conspecifics' fecal smears if the conspecific was larger than if the conspecific was equal to or smaller than the subject. Mean (+ SE) percentages indicated


Received: 19 Aug 2001
Accepted: 21 Jan 2002
  • Download PDF