Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Dec 2001

Genetic Comparison of Three Barbus (Cyprinidae) Morphotypes from the Genale River, Ethiopia

,
, and
Page Range: 1123 – 1129
DOI: 10.1643/0045-8511(2001)001[1123:GCOTBC]2.0.CO;2
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

The large barbs of East Africa are well known for their morphological plasticity. Mitochondrial DNA sequences were compared for specimens of three distinctive barb morphotypes collected syntopically from the Genale River in southeastern Ethiopia. The “normal,” “lipped,” and “large-mouthed” morphotypes are putatively referable to Barbus gananensis. An analysis of molecular variance revealed that the lipped and normal morphotypes are not genetically distinct (ϕST < 0.0001, P = 0.80) and that the group of large-mouthed haplotypes is significantly differentiated from a combined group of normal and lipped haplotypes (ϕST = 0.54, P < 0.001). The evolutionary relationships among the haplotypes were assessed with phylogenetic and minimum-length spanning trees. The results of the phylogenetic and spanning tree analyses are consistent with the analysis of molecular variance. The normal and lipped morphotypes represent morphological variants of B. gananensis, and the large-mouthed morphotype represents a genetically distinctive undescribed species.

Copyright: The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
 Fig. 1. 
 Fig. 1. 

Lateral view of the (A) normal Barbus gananensis, (B) lipped Barbus gananensis, and (C) Barbus sp. large-mouthed morphotypes


 Fig. 2. 
 Fig. 2. 

Minimum-length spanning tree of the (N) normal Barbus gananensis, (L) lipped Barbus gananensis, and (P) Barbus sp. large-mouthed haplotypes. Numbers adjacent to branches represent the minimum number of mutational steps between haplotypes


 Fig. 3. 
 Fig. 3. 

Results of a parsimony-based bootstrap analysis of the (N) normal Barbus gananensis, (L) lipped B. gananensis, and (P) Barbus sp. large-mouthed haplotypes. Numbers above internodes are bootstrap percentage values


Accepted: 16 May 2001
  • Download PDF