Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Aug 2001

Movement Ecology and Seasonal Distribution of Mountain Yellow-Legged Frogs, Rana muscosa, in a High-Elevation Sierra Nevada Basin

and
Page Range: 787 – 793
DOI: 10.1643/0045-8511(2001)001[0787:MEASDO]2.0.CO;2
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Movement ecology and seasonal distribution of mountain yellow-legged frogs (Rana muscosa) in Dusy Basin (3470 m), Kings Canyon National Park, California, were characterized using passive integrated transponder (PIT) surveys and visual encounter surveys. We individually PIT-tagged 500 frogs during the summers of 1997 and 1998 and monitored these individuals during seven recapture surveys in 1997 and 15 recapture surveys in 1998 from the time they emerged from overwintering in July until the lakes froze for the winter in October. Probability of movement between lakes was associated with abundance of Hyla regilla larvae in the different lakes of origin, activity of the frogs (overwintering, breeding, feeding), and time of year. Overland movements exceeding 66 m were observed in 17% of the tagged frogs. Movement between lakes 1 km apart was detected. Site fidelity from 1997 to 1998 was high, and 97% of the tagged frogs recaptured in October of both years were found in the same overwintering lakes. Frogs were more narrowly distributed in spring and fall than in summer. Summer frog densities (number per meter of shoreline) were positively related to water temperature, air temperature, maximum lake depth, and presence of H. regilla larvae and negatively related to presence of trout. Mountain yellow-legged frogs use a range of aquatic sites throughout their activity period, and basins with a variety of deep lakes and shallow ponds may be the most appropriate reserves for this declining species.

Copyright: The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
 Fig. 1. 
 Fig. 1. 

Map of upper Dusy Basin, Kings Canyon National Park, showing lakes 1–11 and associated creeks 30, 31, 32, 33, and 41. Numbers in parentheses represent maximum depth measured in meters. Lakes 1 and 3 contain self-sustaining populations of introduced trout


 Fig. 2. 
 Fig. 2. 

Mean number of mountain yellow-legged frogs (± 1 SE) observed in each water body (L = lake, S = stream) during 1998 count surveys separated into four time periods. (A) 11 July through 25 July when lakes were thawing; (B) 28 July through 8 August when breeding occurred (new egg masses found); (C) 11 August through 30 September when frogs were primarily feeding and sunning; (D) 4 October through 14 October when lakes were beginning to freeze. Note difference in scale among graphs


 Fig. 3. 
 Fig. 3. 

Estimated effects of covariates (number of Hyla regilla tadpoles and date) on the probability of a frog leaving an overwintering lake (A and B) or a summer lake (C and D) using a general additive model with a loess smoother. Dotted lines represent approximate 95% confidence intervals and horizontal line indicates average effect level where 95% bounds completely above or below the line indicate significance. Hatch marks at the bottom of each graph represent data points


Accepted: 14 Dec 2000
  • Download PDF