Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 24 Jul 2023

Rates of Alloparental Care by Male Stickleback in Natural Lake Populations

,
, and
Page Range: 368 – 375
DOI: 10.1643/i2021144
Save
Download PDF

In many animal species, alternative reproductive tactics can result in alloparenting: adult individuals providing care for juveniles that are not genetically their own progeny. In species with parental care, males may exhibit “sneaking” behavior and fertilize eggs in the nest of another male, or nesting males may commit egg theft from a more successful male, possibly to help attract females. Alloparenting may have important consequences for both male and female reproductive output and mate choice, but rates of such non-paternity in natural populations are poorly understood in many taxa, as are the ecological factors that might influence these rates. Here, we quantified the frequency of non-paternity between males and the eggs in their nests within 15 natural populations of Threespine Stickleback, and tested whether the frequency of mismatch was predicted by characteristics of the lake (lake size and nest density) or features of individual males (body size and diet) or their chosen nest location (depth and presence of vegetation). The frequency of non-paternity was relatively high across all lakes (23–66%) but was not explained by lake-level characteristics (lake area or nest density). Alloparenting was more likely for individual males with more benthic diets (as measured by stable isotopes) and for males whose nests were closer to vegetation, although this effect varied across lakes. Our results suggest that individual-level characteristics of the male and nest influence the frequency of alloparenting, and that variation among individuals and populations should be considered in studies of the genetics and evolutionary consequences of alternative reproductive tactics.

Copyright: © 2023 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Frequency of alloparenting across lakes. Rates of mismatch (filled symbols) and 95% confidence intervals are shown with the total number of eggs tested for mismatch. Lakes are ordered from smallest to largest in surface area.


Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Mismatch probability based on male Z-δ13C (a measure of diet, standardized to remove among-lake variation in mean and variance). Higher (less negative) values of Z-δ13C indicate a more benthic diet; a bean plot shows the distribution while the tick marks represent individual data points.


Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Relationships between mismatch proportion and presence or absence of vegetation within 1 m of male stickleback nests across all lakes (n = 15). Bold lines indicate significant lake trends (P < 0.05).


Contributor Notes

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, 321 Steinhaus Hall, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697; ORCID: 0000-0002-2833-0832; Email: raciner@uci.edu. Send correspondence to this address.
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 340 Great King Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand; ORCID: 0000-0003-0709-5260; Email: travis.ingram@otago.ac.nz.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, 75 N. Eagleville Road, Unit 3043, Storrs, Connecticut 06269; ORCID: 0000-0003-3148-6296; Email: daniel.bolnick@uconn.edu.

Associate Editor: M. T. Craig.

Received: 29 Dec 2021
Accepted: 01 Mar 2023
  • Download PDF