Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Feb 2023

Reproductive and Morphological Characteristics of Hemidactylus turcicus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) and Tarentola annularis (Squamata: Phyllodactylidae) in Southern Egypt

Page Range: 29 – 43
DOI: 10.1643/h2021109
Save
Download PDF

Hemidactylus turcicus and Tarentola annularis are occasionally sympatric and are ecologically similar in vertical wall microhabitat. For this reason, I studied their sexual, fat-body, and liver cycles for three years. All morphological variables are male-biased in T. annularis, unlike male H. turcicus, which showed significant differences in head sizes only. Females exhibited a spring to summer vitellogenic period with ovulation occurring during mid-spring to mid-summer in T. annularis and from late spring to late summer in H. turcicus. The mean clutch size of oviductal eggs (1.86) and relative clutch mass (0.188) was higher in H. turcicus than in T. annularis (1.67 and 0.132). Relative clutch mass was negatively correlated with snout–vent length in T. annularis but was not in H. turcicus. Sperm were present in the epididymis for eight months in H. turcicus while year-round in T. annularis. Post-breeding, masses of liver and fat body increased in both sexes of both species. There were significant differences in fat body and liver masses between the sexes of both species. Based on the liver-mass cycle, the energy expenditure on reproduction in male and female T. annularis was high compared with the corresponding sexes of H. turcicus. Testicular recrudescence began in late fall or early winter corresponding to lower temperatures, photoperiod, and precipitation. Testicular regression occurred at the highest temperatures in late summer and early fall.

Copyright: © 2023 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Monthly variation in the mean temperature, relative humidity, and photoperiod in Abu Rawash (A) and Izbet al Asfar (B).


Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Mass–snout vent length relationships in Hemidactylus turcicus (A) and Tarentola annularis (B). The male regression equation is above the lines, whereas the female regression equation is below.


Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Monthly variation in the mean of the masses of ovary, oviduct, and liver of female Hemidactylus turcicus (A–C) and Tarentola annularis (D–F). Sample size for each monthly sample is given.


Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Monthly variation in the testis mass, percent reproductive specimens for males (sperm in epididymides), and liver mass of male Hemidactylus turcicus (A–C) and male Tarentola annularis (D–F). Sample size for each monthly sample is given.


Contributor Notes

Department of Zoology, University of Cairo, Giza, Egypt; Email: mamdouh_330@yahoo.com.

Associate Editor: D. S. Siegel.

Received: 27 Sept 2021
Accepted: 20 Aug 2022
  • Download PDF