Towards a Diagnostic Tool for Turtle Ootaxonomy: Investigation of Microstructural Differences in the Eggshells of Australian Freshwater Turtles
Researchers frequently encounter turtle nests after the nest has been raided, finding only eggshell fragments that are difficult to identify. Valuable information on the breeding biology and needs of different species might still be collected from these nests if remains could be confidently assigned to a particular species. However, this can be difficult if there are multiple turtle species nesting within an area at a given time, and gross-scale characteristics such as egg size and shape are no longer available due to damage. This study examined eggshell microstructure, by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), among multiple species of freshwater turtle eggshell fragments, with the aim of potentially developing a diagnostic tool for species identification. Eggshell fragments were collected from known sources of four species of turtle native to eastern Australia: Eastern Long-necked Turtle (Chelodina longicollis), Murray River Turtle (Emydura macquarii), Bell's Turtle (Myuchelys bellii), and Bellinger River Turtle (M. georgesi). Fragments were scanned and analyzed for microstructural and ultrastructural features, and measured for differences in feature size across species. Central plaque diameter emerged as a potential diagnostic feature for separating species, with longneck turtle eggshells having no visible plaques, Murray River Turtle eggshells having relatively small mean plaque size (19.8 μm ± 10.28 SD), while Bell's Turtle (43.5 μm ± 14.16 SD) and Bellinger River Turtle eggshells (41.9 μm ± 15.41 SD) had relatively large plaques with little overlap between genera. Other measured features (shell unit size, basal knob size, and shell unit density) significantly differed in means among species but overlapped in range, or showed a lack of statistical difference, likely preventing the technique being definitive with a single measure. Some of this variance may be due to inherent confounding factors, such as the replicability of fragment preparation, condition of eggshells, and stage of embryonic development at the time of collection. These results suggest that use of measurements of microstructural features has promise as a means for distinguishing the provenance of eggshell fragments, and further investigation is warranted to develop site-specific protocols for use as a diagnostic tool for turtle ootaxonomy.

Images of turtle eggshells under a scanning electron microscope. (A) Fragment of eggshell mineral layer from a Murray River Turtle (Emydura macquarii) egg, displaying shell units (white circles) and pores (*). (B) Fragment of eggshell mineral layer extracted from a dead Eastern Long-necked Turtle (Chelodina longicollis). The female had suffered road mortality prior to oviposition. (C) Outer surface of eggshell membrane layer from a Murray River Turtle egg, displaying basal knobs (white circle) and central plaques (*). (D) Fragment of eggshell outer membrane layer extracted from a dead Eastern Long-necked Turtle. (E) Cross section of an eggshell membrane from a Bell's Turtle (Myuchelys bellii) egg, displaying shell units of the outer mineral layer (dark circles) and the membrane layer (*). (F) Inner surface of eggshell membrane layer from a Bellinger River Turtle (M. georgesi) egg. Damage to the membrane (*) appears to reveal the fibrous matrix of the membrane interior.

Size comparison of turtle eggshell units across species: (A) largest shell unit diameter (F3,86 = 8.1, P < 0.01), (B) smallest shell unit diameter (F3,86 = 6.0, P < 0.01), (C) ratio of shell unit diameters (F3,86 = 1.9, P = 0.15), and (D) shell unit density (F3,18 = 1.3, P = 0.30).

Size and density comparison of turtle egg membrane structures across species: (A) central plaque diameter (F2,87 = 33.9, P < 0.01) and (B) basal knob diameter (F2,87 = 7.9, P < 0.01). Note that plaques and basal knobs were not visible on any Eastern Long-necked Turtle (Chelodina longicollis) images, so are not included here.
Contributor Notes
Associate Editor: D. S. Siegel.