Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 15 Nov 2022

Feeding Niche and Predator–Prey Size Relationship in the Whiptail Lizard Aspidoscelis lineattissima (Squamata: Teiidae) in Insular and Continental Populations of the Mexican Pacific

,
,
, and
Page Range: 737 – 749
DOI: 10.1643/h2021062
Save
Download PDF

We explore the feeding habits of two populations of the lizard Aspidoscelis lineattissima from two localities (Cocinas = island and Xametla = mainland) under the hypothesis that in an insular environment, there is less selection of food, because it is a relatively comfortable environment to forage due to the presence of few competitors and predators. We also examine the predator–prey size relationship in this lizard species with the intention of distinguishing possible ontogenetic changes in the choice of prey sizes in the two localities. In stomach contents of the lizards from mainland, a total of 2,616 prey items were recorded, while on the island, 1,357 prey items were found. This number of prey was divided into 18 categories for the mainland and 20 for the island. In general terms, the most important prey in the diet of lizards from both localities were Isoptera, Coleoptera (adult and larvae), Araneae, Orthoptera, Hymenoptera (ants and others), Blattodea, and Diptera. Island lizards presented a greater amount of plant material in their stomach contents. The breadth of the food niche was greater on the island than on the mainland. Although statistically there were no differences regarding food overlap between localities, the highest overlap values between groups (age classes and sexes) were found on the mainland. We found a positive relationship between morphological variables of the lizards (snout–vent length, head width, and head length) with the maximum and mean values of the prey volume in both localities. This reveals an ontogenetic change that indicates that as lizards grow, they add a greater quantity of large prey to their diet and at the same time eat smaller prey. These results showed that the diet of the lizards from both localities was similar to other species of the genus. The feeding habits of a species in contrasting environments is evidence that is helpful for understanding the foraging patterns more clearly, and the possible connection with its life history characteristics, shedding more light on the hypothesis of niche amplitude and the optimal foraging theory.

Copyright: © 2022 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Aspidoscelis lineattissima (adult male) captured, marked, and released in the Xametla population, Jalisco. Photograph: Uriel Hernández-Salinas.


Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Geographic location of Xametla (mainland) and Cocinas (island); both localities are in the region of Chamela, municipality of La Huerta in the state of Jalisco, Mexico.


Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Environments and types of vegetation in the localities of Xametla (A and B) and Cocinas (C and D). To see more detail of the description of the localities, see the materials and methods section.


Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Volume (mm3), frequency, and food importance index of prey category consumed during rainy and dry seasons by lizards (adult, juveniles, hatchlings; males and females) of both populations (Xametla and Cocinas).


Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Relationship between body size of predators and prey volume by population. The black circles represent maximum values, triangles represent mean values, and squares represent minimum values of prey volume. A represents the relationship between SVL (snout–vent length) vs. volume variables of the prey; B and C represent the relationship between head width and head length with the volume variables in Xametla, respectively; the letters D, E, and F represent the same relations for the Cocinas. The X and Y scale are represented in logarithms.


Contributor Notes

Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional (CIIDIR) Unidad Durango, Calle Sigma 119 Fraccionamiento 20 de Noviembre II Durango, Durango 34220, México; Email: uhernndez3@gmail.com.
Laboratorio de Ecología de Poblaciones, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Instituto de Ciencias Básicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Km 4.5 carretera Pachuca-Tulancingo, 42184, Mineral de La Reforma, Hidalgo, México; Email: (ARB) ramibautistaa@gmail.com; and (LATH) lizzeth.torres97@gmail.com. Send correspondence to ARB.
Laboratorio de Ecología y Diversidad Faunística, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Avenida de las Ciencias S/N, Santa Fe Juriquilla, C. P. 76230, Querétaro, Querétaro, México; Email: cruzelizalde@gmail.com.

Associate Editor: J. Kerby.

Received: 25 May 2021
Accepted: 20 Aug 2022
  • Download PDF