Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 05 Aug 2022

Hybridization between the Woodland Salamanders Plethodon cinereus and P. electromorphus Is Not Widespread

,
,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 430 – 438
DOI: 10.1643/h2021081
Save
Download PDF

A recent study reported widespread hybridization between the Eastern Red-backed Salamander (Plethodon cinereus) and the Northern Ravine Salamander (P. electromorphus) in northern Ohio. In this study, DNA sequence data were obtained from three nuclear loci and 20 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified from the sequences. They found that 48 out of 90 individuals from 13 populations were hybrids, and in some localities every individual possessed an admixed genotype. As these results contradict our observations, and because levels of hybridization impact our interpretation of past and ongoing studies, we revisited the data. First we reanalyzed the original SNPs using STRUCTURE, then we repeated the analysis using haplotypes instead of SNPs. We found that K = 2 was best supported by both analyses, and they agree in recovering lower levels of hybridization than originally reported. For example, five populations in the original study identified as highly admixed or composed entirely of admixed genotypes we found to be pure P. cinereus or to lack evidence of extensive admixture. Similar results were obtained using NEWHYBRIDS and analyses based on gene trees. We conclude that while hybridization between P. cinereus and P. electromorphus occurs, it is much more restricted than originally reported.

Copyright: © 2022 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Map of the sampled localities in central and northern Ohio. Localities are numbered, match Table 1, and are used throughout the text.


Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

STRUCTURE results using nuclear sequence data coded as haplotypes (unlinked) and as SNPs (linked). Results are for K = 2. The red group corresponds with P. cinereus and the black group corresponds with P. electromorphus. Individuals with Q scores < 0.9 for either parental type were scored as hybrids.


Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Bar chart summarizing the assignments of individuals to parental and hybrid classes. Analyses include the linked data in STRUCTURE (K = 5; L16), unlinked data (haplotypes) in STRUCTURE (K = 2; this paper), analysis of gene trees (Tree), and unlinked data in NEWHYBRIDS (NH). For the last analysis, some individuals were not assigned to any class (parental or hybrid) with confidence (‘Unresolved'). Localities correspond to Table 1 and Figure 1. See also Supplemental Table 1 (see Data Accessibility).


Contributor Notes

Ohio Center for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Irvine 107, Athens, Ohio 45701; Email: (SRK) kuchta@ohio.edu; and (BPW) bw120818@ohio.edu. Send correspondence to SRK.
Department of Natural History, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611; Email: mhantak@ufl.edu.
Department of Biology, John Carroll University, University Heights, Ohio 44118; Email: (CMH) chickerson@jcu.edu; and (CDA) canthony@jcu.edu.
Department of Biology, The College of Wooster, 931 College Mall, Wooster, Ohio 44691; Email: rlehtinen@wooster.edu.

Associate Editor: B. L. Stuart.

Received: 25 Jun 2021
Accepted: 11 Jan 2022
  • Download PDF