Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 19 Jul 2021

Response to Salinity Challenge in Non-native Cichlid Fishes of the Genus Herichthys Introduced in the Gulf Coast Region of the United States

,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 587 – 597
DOI: 10.1643/i2019334
Save
Download PDF

The Rio Grande Cichlid, Herichthys cyanoguttatus, is native to northeastern Mexico and southern Texas and has been introduced at many places in the US. Recent research has indicated that the true identity of at least some populations of Herichthys cf. cyanoguttatus in Louisiana is H. carpintis and not H. cyanoguttatus. In both their native and introduced ranges, H. carpintis seems to occupy a more lowland/coastal distribution than does Herichthys cyanoguttatus, suggesting that the two species may differ physiologically or ecologically in their ability to invade new environments. Previous research has found that Herichthys cf. cyanoguttatus from Louisiana (which were most likely H. carpintis) have a high tolerance to salinity and pose a threat to both fresh and brackish waters, but the osmoregulatory capacity of H. cyanoguttatus from Texas is unknown. To determine if H. cyanoguttatus from Texas might also have a high tolerance to salinity and pose a threat to both fresh and brackish waters, we performed three experiments to assess response to salinity challenges in H. cyanoguttatus from Texas and in H. carpintis from Louisiana. In response to acute moderate salinity challenge, we found a non-significant salinity*species interaction in change in body mass, a species difference in hematocrit, and no differences in plasma chloride or osmolality. In a 120-day chronic salinity exposure, salinity concentration was inversely related to growth rate, but there was no difference in growth between the two species. In an acute challenge, high salinity concentrations had a strong negative effect on survival, but survival was not different between the two species. Both species were highly tolerant of salinity, indicating that both species might be able to use brackish waters in coastal areas to expand their ranges in the US. Finally, we found that H. cyanoguttatus from Texas spent more time swimming than did H. carpintis from Louisiana, suggesting that the two species could differ in the way they interact behaviorally with native fish communities.

Copyright: © 2021 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Physiological changes in response to acute (4 hr) salinity challenge in H. cyanoguttatus captured at an introduced site in Texas (black bars) and H. carpintis captured at an introduced site in Louisiana (white bars). Change in (A) body mass, (B) hematocrit, (C) plasma chloride, and (D) plasma osmolality. Bars = mean ± SD. Percent mass change showed a significant effect from salinity, and non-significant effects from species and from the species*salinity interaction (see Table 1). Hematocrit showed a significant effect from species. There was no effect on plasma chloride or plasma osmolality as a result of any of the factors.


Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Growth and behavior of H. cyanoguttatus descended from populations introduced in Texas and H. carpintis descended from populations introduced in Louisiana, raised in a common garden, and then exposed to different salinity concentrations for 120 days. (A) Standard length, (B) mass, (C) percent time spent active over three 3-minute periods throughout the experiment. Black bars = H. cyanoguttatus; white bars = H. carpintis. Bars = mean + SD. Growth significantly decreased with increasing salinity in both species, and H. cyanoguttatus spent significantly more percent time active than H. carpintis. Species, or the interaction between species and salinity, had no significant effect on growth (see text).


Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Survival function of H. cyanoguttatus descended from populations introduced in Texas and H. carpintis descended from populations introduced in Louisiana, raised in a common garden, and then exposed abruptly to different salinity concentrations. Solid lines are H. cyanoguttatus; dashed lines are H. carpintis. Circles = 14 ppt, squares = 21 ppt, diamonds = 28 ppt, triangles = 35 ppt. Salinity had a significant negative effect on survival, but there was no significant difference between H. cyanoguttatus and H. carpintis (see text).


Contributor Notes

Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biology, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, Ohio 44106; Email: (RGO) rgo@cwru.edu; (JH) jrh147@case.edu; and (JS) jls313@case.edu. Send reprint requests to RGO.
Sam Houston State University, Texas Research Institute for Environmental Studies, Huntsville, Texas 77341; Email: (WIL) BIO_WIL@shsu.edu.
Sam Houston State University, Department of Biological Sciences, Huntsville, Texas 77341.
Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, 300 Hackberry Lane, Box 870344, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487; Email: scmccain@crimson.ua.edu.
Georgia Southwestern State University, Department of Biology, 800 Georgia Southwestern State University Drive, Americus, Georgia 31709; Email: otto.lorenz@gsw.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin, Integrative Biology, Biodiversity Center, 2900 Innovation Blvd., Austin, Texas 78758-4445; Email: (AEC) acohen@mail.utexas.edu; and (DAH) deanhend@austin.utexas.edu.

Associate Editor: D. Buth.

Received: 22 Nov 2019
Accepted: 18 Dec 2020
  • Download PDF