Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 28 May 2020

No Sperm Morphometric Differences between Two Populations of Diamond-backed Watersnakes (Nerodia rhombifer) with Varying Resource Availability

,
,
, and
Page Range: 376 – 380
DOI: 10.1643/CG-17-692
Save
Download PDF

Vast differences in available resources between habitats can have profound influences on aspects of an organism's life history, such as reproductive investment. Our study investigated how differences in nutrient availability affect sperm size in Diamond-backed Watersnakes (Nerodia rhombifer). We compared body size and sperm morphometrics between two populations with differing nutrient availability: a naturally occurring lake and a commercial fish farm. We hypothesized that prey availability affects sperm morphometrics. Our null hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in sperm morphometrics between populations, whereas our alternative hypothesis was that the snakes from the fish farm would have significantly longer sperm. We measured total sperm length, sperm head length, sperm tail length, and snout–vent length (SVL). We then used two-tailed t-tests and AIC model selection to test our hypotheses. SVL was not correlated with sperm size. Furthermore, none of the sperm morphometrics were significantly different between the two populations. Finally, a nearly 1:1 correlation between sperm tail length and total sperm length was found. AIC model selection corroborated these results by choosing only sperm head length and sperm tail length as significant predictors of total sperm length. This is the first published study to explicitly compare sperm morphometrics between two populations of the same snake species. Additional studies of this nature are required to corroborate whether lack of significant differences in sperm morphometrics among snake populations are common.

Copyright: © 2020 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

SEM micrographs of a sperm in Nerodia rhombifer with the head (left) and complete sperm (right) highlighted by the measurement tool in Image J. The non-highlighted portion of the sperm in the left image comprises the tail.


Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Strong positive correlation between sperm tail length and total sperm length in Nerodia rhombifer (r = 0.997).


Contributor Notes

Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Boulevard, Orlando, Florida 32816; Email: jkonvalina@knights.ucf.edu. Send reprint requests to this address.
Department of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, P.O. Box 599, State University, Arkansas 72467; Email: jonathanw.stanley@smail.astate.edu.
Department of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University (Emeritus), P.O. Box 599, State University, Arkansas 72467; Email: strauth@astate.edu.
Department of Biology, Harding University (Emeritus), Box 12251, Searcy, Arkansas 72143; Email: plummer@harding.edu.

Associate Editor: D. S. Siegel.

Received: 05 Oct 2017
Accepted: 03 Feb 2020
  • Download PDF