Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 10 Mar 2020

The Effects of Common Snapping Turtles on a Freshwater Food Web

,
, and
Page Range: 132 – 139
DOI: 10.1643/CE-19-258
Save
Download PDF

While organisms are typically considered permanent residents of a community, many transient organisms occupy a community for only brief periods. Despite the duration, the effects of a short visit by a top predator may remain long after departure. To test hypotheses on the impacts of a short-term visit by a top predator on pond communities, we used artificial ponds and constructed food web treatments that varied in trophic structure (Control Food Web = no predators present, Bluegill Food Web = only intermediate predators present, and Full Food Web = top and intermediate predators present). The constructed food webs were replicated five times and contained two prey species (frog tadpoles), an intermediate predator (fish), and one top predator (freshwater turtle). The Full Food Web simulated a four-day visit by Chelydra serpentina (Common Snapping Turtle). Predation by Lepomis macrochirus (Bluegill) reduced mean tadpole survival for Hyla chrysoscelis (Cope's Gray Tree Frog) in all food webs, including the Full Food Web with C. serpentina, compared to the Control Food Web. Although C. serpentina had no effects on tadpoles of H. chrysoscelis, the top predator reduced mean survival and increased mean mass of Rana sphenocephala (Southern Leopard Frog) when compared to the Bluegill Food Web. Therefore, our results suggest that brief visits from transient organisms, especially top predators, can alter community structure and initiate cascading effects.

Copyright: © 2020 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
<bold>Fig. 1</bold>
Fig. 1

Diagram of experimental food webs. In each food web, the following abbreviations stand for: R. sphenocephala = Rana sphenocephala; H. chrysoscelis = Hyla chrysoscelis; L. macrochirus = Lepomis macrochirus; and C. serpentina = Chelydra serpentina. The solid arrows represent the feeding relationships within each food web. The following food webs are represented: (A) control, (B) Bluegill, and (C) Full Food Web (all predators present). Trophic complexity increases as additional predators are added, ending with the most complex, or “full” food web.


<bold>Fig. 2</bold>
Fig. 2

Mean survival to metamorphosis of Cope's Gray Tree Frog (Hyla chrysoscelis) metamorphs among our three food webs. Error bars represent ±1 standard error. Letters above bars indicate statistical differences in food webs.


<bold>Fig. 3</bold>
Fig. 3

Mean survival to metamorphosis of Southern Leopard Frog (Rana sphenocephala) metamorphs among our three food webs. Error bars represent ±1 standard error. Letters above bars indicate statistical differences in food webs.


<bold>Fig. 4</bold>
Fig. 4

Mean (dry) mass of Southern Leopard Frog (Rana sphenocephala) among our three food webs. Error bars represent ±1 standard error. Letters above bars indicate statistical differences in food webs.


Contributor Notes

Associate Editor: J. D. Litzgus.

Received: 25 Jun 2019
Accepted: 24 Dec 2019
  • Download PDF