Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 09 Feb 2018

Variation in Pond Hydroperiod Affects Larval Growth in Southern Leopard Frogs, Lithobates sphenocephalus

and
Page Range: 70 – 76
DOI: 10.1643/CE-17-696
Save
Download PDF

Size at metamorphosis is an important correlate of amphibian fitness. Several, often interrelated factors, such as hydroperiod, competition, and food availability, determine metamorph size. Hydroperiod is a defining characteristic of ponds, but pond drying is not always a deterministic process, and refilling can occur prior to complete drying. We conducted an experiment to test if a recurring four-week partial drying/filling cycle affected amphibian growth and size using a population of overwintering larval Lithobates sphenocephalus (Southern Leopard Frogs). Effects of the drying/filling cycle varied over time on larval mass, but this cycle had no overall effect on other measures of larval or metamorph size. Metamorph size covaried with both survival and larval period length: individuals were larger at metamorphosis when survival was lower and among individuals with longer larval periods. We observed the first reported instance of prolonged larval periods across multiple winters in L. sphenocephalus, wherein some of our larvae exposed to the drying/filling cycle required 18 months to reach metamorphosis. Individuals that overwintered as larvae for a second winter were larger at metamorphosis than those that metamorphosed at the end of the previous summer. Lithobates sphenocephalus maximize metamorphic size rather than optimize metamorphic timing, and metamorph size can also be affected by larval survival.

Copyright: © 2018 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
<bold>Fig. 1</bold>
Fig. 1

Average (A) mass and (B) total length of larvae in Constant and Fluctuating mesocosms on sampling dates over time from 11 November 2014 until 9 May 2015 (means ± SE).


<bold>Fig. 2</bold>
Fig. 2

Average (A) larval period length, (B) survival, (C) mass, and (D) snout–urostyle length of metamorphs from Constant and Fluctuating treatments (means ± SE).


<bold>Fig. 3</bold>
Fig. 3

Average (A) number of metamorphs and (B) metamorph mass per Fluctuating and Constant mesocosm during each month throughout the duration of the experiment (means ± SE).


Contributor Notes

Associate Editor: C. Beachy.

Received: 13 Oct 2017
Accepted: 30 Oct 2017
  • Download PDF