Stopped Dead in Their Tracks: The Impact of Railways on Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Movement and Behavior
Habitat fragmentation is one of the leading causes of biodiversity decline and most commonly results from urbanization and construction of transportation infrastructure. Roads are known to negatively impact species, but railways can often cause similar effects. Certain taxa, such as turtles and tortoises, are more vulnerable to railways than others due to limitations in mobility. We studied the impact of rails on the movement and behavior of Gopher Tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), a threatened, highly terrestrial species likely in frequent contact with railways. First, we used radio-telemetry to determine the frequency of railway crossings and compared this to correlated random walk (CRW) simulations to assess if tortoises were crossing the rails less frequently than is expected by unconstrained movement. Second, we placed tortoises into the railway and measured behavior for one hour to assess crossing ability. Lastly, we tested whether trenches dug underneath the rails could allow safe passage for tortoises. We found that railways impacted the movement of Gopher Tortoises. Gopher Tortoises crossed the railway less often than what would be expected by unhindered movement for five of our ten tortoises tracked. During behavioral trials, 0 of 24 tortoises placed within the railways were capable of escaping from the rails. Using game cameras, we detected tortoises using trenches dug underneath the rails and between the ties 68 times over the course of a single summer. For minimal financial cost, the trenches facilitated tortoise movement across the railway, maintained full rail functionality, and created an escape route for individuals that were trapped between the rails, and thus should be implemented as a mitigation strategy. Given the thousands of km of railways around the world, we recommend future studies focus on the new field of rail ecology.

(A) The 20 m railway plot in which Gopher Tortoises were tested for crossing ability and behavioral differences between Habituated (n = 12) and Naïve (n = 12) railway familiarity. (B) The control plot in which tortoises (n = 12) were tested for crossing ability and behavioral differences solely on the presence of a visual barrier.

(A) The trench dug underneath the rails and between the railway ties. A game camera faces the entrance/exit on the west side of the railway to photograph Gopher Tortoises passing from one side to the other. (B) A series of pictures of a single Gopher Tortoise moving from the east side of the tracks to the west side.

(A) Three simulated correlated random walks (CRWs) by a single tortoise (ID: 5233) confined to the coastal strand habitat. Each simulation is a different patterned line with the start point designated by the triangle (▴) and the stop points designated by squares (▪). Each simulation counted the number of times the tortoise crossed the railway (represented by the thick dotted line). (B) Histogram of the number of expected railway crosses based on 1000 simulated CRWs by a single tortoise (ID: 5233). The observed number of crosses is plotted with the dotted line and is significantly below the expected number of crosses.

Principal component analysis (PCA) with 95% confidence ellipses comparing tortoise behavior expressed over a one-hour observation period. Confidence ellipse fills are based on railway familiarity in addition to the control group. Control tortoises fall well outside the multivariate space of tortoises placed in the railway, demonstrating the inability of tortoises to cross railways.
Contributor Notes
Associate Editor: J. D. Litzgus.