Phylogenetic Uncertainty and Taxonomic Re-revisions: An Example from the Australian Short-necked Turtles (Testudines: Chelidae)
Molecular data have greatly influenced our concepts of species and their relationships in the last few decades, and as a consequence the taxonomy of most vertebrate clades has been repeatedly revised to reflect phylogeny. However, as larger and more complete molecular data sets become available, the sometimes striking disparities between taxonomic revisions based on individual gene trees (particularly those based on mitochondrial DNA) and species trees has become increasingly apparent. Here, we present data from 13 nuclear and one mitochondrial gene. Our results demonstrate that the recent taxonomic proposal erecting the new Australian chelid genus Flaviemys (Testudines: Chelidae) was an unnecessary action, and that recognition of Flaviemys confuses, rather than clarifies, a phylogeny-based taxonomy of the group. Taxonomic actions have many broad repercussions, and we recommend that taxonomic changes should be proposed cautiously and only when they are based on the strongest possible data and analyses.

Majority-rule consensus of the posterior distribution of trees from the Bayesian analysis of the COI data set (33 individuals, 727 bp). Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) greater than or equal to 90 are shown at appropriate nodes. Myuchelys is reconstructed as paraphyletic due to the position of M. purvisi, although support for the key node supporting this is relatively low (BPP = 0.91). Outgroups were removed for clarity of presentation.

Majority-rule consensus tree of the posterior distribution of trees from the Bayesian analyses of the concatenated nuclear loci data set (37 individuals, 13 loci, 9833 bp). Bayesian support values (BPP) are indicated, and the outgroups were removed for clarity of presentation.

Majority-rule consensus tree of the posterior distribution of trees from the species tree analyses of the concatenated nuclear loci data set (37 individuals, 13 loci, 9833 bp). Bayesian support values (BPP) are indicated, and the outgroups were excluded from this analysis.
Contributor Notes
Associate Editor: D. S. Siegel.