Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: Nov 27, 2023

Investigating Ex Situ Competitive Interactions in a Novel Fish Community with Implications for the Introduction of Sunfish (Lepomis spp.) in Headwater Streams

,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 634 – 640
DOI: 10.1643/i2022002
Save
Download PDF

Abiotic filters like high gradients or hydraulic drops play an integral role in excluding species from interacting with some headwater communities. When humans manipulate the ecosystems to install small ponds in the headwaters of river networks, they allow stocked species of fishes to escape and bypass these filters creating novel communities already under stress from other environmental changes. We investigated a novel headwater community to assess if and how escaped Lepomis spp. compete with a native headwater fish, Chrosomus tennesseensis (Tennessee Dace). We designed an ex situ mesocosm study to test the effects of exploitative and interference competition by two species—L. macrochirus and L. cyanellus—on C. tennesseensis. We observed strong intraspecific competition that exceeded the effects of both Lepomis spp. on C. tennesseensis. Although one individual was always a clear winner in intraspecific interactions, morphology at the beginning of the experiment could not explain why one individual was more successful than another. We also observed marginally higher growth rate in C. tennesseensis when Lepomis spp. were caged rather than free-swimming indicating that introduced Lepomis spp. likely impact headwater fishes through exploitative and interference competition in addition to the potential of predation at large size differences. More research is needed to understand the breadth and magnitude of potential problems posed by the unintentional introduction of stocked fishes to low-order streams.

  • Download PDF
Copyright: © 2023 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Change in body condition of Chrosomus tennesseensis (quantified by the scaled mass index) in response to being housed with different fish. Individuals from intraspecific treatments were separated by mesocosm into losing and winning categories for comparison with interspecific treatments with L. macrochirus or L. cyanellus. Free-swimming individuals were allowed to physically interact and exploitatively consume prey, whereas caged individuals were allowed to communicate with visual and chemical cues, but were prevented from physically interacting or competing for the same prey. Letters indicate statistically significant pairwise differences using an alpha of 0.05.


Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Investigation of the relationships between the starting morphology of Chrosomus tennesseensis, including standard length (A), body condition (B), and length difference relative to the other individual in intraspecific pairs (C), and the change in body condition experienced over our 46-day experiment. None of these starting morphological measurements were associated with the outcome or success of individuals in intraspecific pairs (A, R2 = 0.17, P = 0.272; B, R2 = 0.03, P = 0.656). Body condition was quantified using the scaled mass index, and symbols indicate individuals within the same mesocosm. Black symbols indicate the winners of interactions, while the gray symbols indicate the losers of intraspecific interactions.


Contributor Notes

Department of Biology, University of the South, 735 University Avenue, Sewanee, Tennessee 37383; Email: (KC) kkcecala@sewanee.edu. Send correspondence to KC.
Tennessee Aquarium Conservation Institute, 175 Baylor School Road, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37405; Present address: Southeastern Aquatic Resources Partnership, 1031 Tiberius Way, Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37128.
Renewable Energy Wildlife Institute, 700 12th Street, NW Suite 700, Washington, DC 20005.
Department of Biology, Appalachian State University, Box 32027, Boone, North Carolina 28608.

Associate Editor: D. Buth and W. L. Smith.

Received: Jan 02, 2022
Accepted: Sep 19, 2023